Showing posts with label children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label children. Show all posts

Monday, April 8, 2013

Your Children are Our Children


This one has created quite an uproar over the last few days. But Melissa Harris-Perry's views are fairly common in leftists circles, especially in academia, where Ms. Perry can be found when she's not broadcasting to MSNBC's miniscule audience. Her Communitarian and collectivist notions of child rearing can be heard almost daily on college campuses throughout the country.

Normally, the left isn't this publicly candid, since even they - mostly - know how toxic an unvarnished expression of their true intentions can be to most Americans. That's why MSNBC can be so useful and instructive. At minimum, dozens of people were involved in the production and airing of this promo, so the network clearly felt it reflected the views of its audience, and themselves:

   “We have never invested as much in public education as we should have because we’ve always had kind of a private notion of children – ‘Your kid is yours, and totally your responsibility.’ We haven’t had a very collective notion that these are our children. So part of it is we have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents, or kids belong to their families, and recognize that kids belong to whole communities.”

 The United States spends more per student on education than any industrialized country in the world, and receives mediocre results at best.  But that's not quite what Ms Perry is talking about. She wants the community (State) and its values do be the dominant influence in children's lives. Skyrocketing out of wedlock births, especially prevalent among younger and less educated women, have provided the left with a growing number of children for whom the government becomes the second parent, and the school as the place that provides the very food they eat.  Many of these kids will never learn much of anything useful and will be far more likely to have negative outcomes as adults, but they will be sufficiently indoctrinated with a statist value system. If you belong to the community as a child, then you will belong to it as an adult.

The problem for Ms. Perry is that too many families are the biggest influence their kids lives, and they teach them subversive values and beliefs like liberty, individualism and self reliance. They may even tell their kids - as I did with my two college graduate sons - to not believe everything their teachers told them, and to be critically thinking individuals above all else. This is why the left continuously attacks home-schooling, with some making a constitutional argument for outright bans. The left's opposition to vouchers and charter schools is not just about the greed of the NEA. It's about future generations universally believing their self worth is calculated based on their value or cost to the collective.

Like many parents, I view the raising of children as a long process of gradually letting go. That we teach, and then give them increasing levels of  independence and responsibility, until they are ready to make their own way in the world.  

The authoritarians view your children not as an end in themselves, with the right to live life for its own sake, but as a means to their ends. 

  

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

YOU take care of MY kids



Here we have a 29 year old single mother that's begging the rest of us to pay for her irresponsibility.



FLINT, Michigan -- With 10 kids and no vehicle, Latrica Ryan is used to juggling.Going to a movie or out for dinner is a like plotting a major tactical undertaking.

Not that such outings happen that much.

"It would really be nice if I could take my kids where they needed to go, instead of having to find them a ride," Ryan said. "And when we do go somewhere, I have to pay four or five people (for gas) to get us all there.

"I have booster seats and car seats. It's a lot."Ryan, is a 29-year-old single stay-at-home mother of five sons and five daughters, who range in age from 2 months to 13 years.


Where are the fathers? No one knows or seems to care. Obviously I (we) are already paying for food stamps, subsidized housing, school breakfasts, lunch and just about everything else for this brood. Including her asinine MySpace page. But it's not enough.


If I had ten dogs in my my house that I couldn't take care of, you can bet your ass they would be taken away in about five minutes. Her story is prima facie evidence that she's an unfit mother and those kids should be taken from her.


This woman can have as many kids as she wants as long as she doesn't expect me to pay for them. What about my kids and their future? Can't I keep my money for them and not have to give it to useless slugs like Latrica Ryan?


At this point, it's clear she's an immature parasite that's raising ten more like her to be drags on society as well.







Thursday, October 9, 2008

Girl, 15, Faces Child Porn Charges for Nude Cell Pictures of Herself

Common sense is now officially dead:

NEWARK, Ohio — Central Ohio authorities have filed felony charges against a 15-year-old girl accused of taking nude cell phone photos of herself and sending them to high school classmates.


According to these champions of stupidity, the girl has exploited a minor (herself).

Police say the Newark Licking Valley student was arrested Friday and held over the weekend. On Monday, she entered denials to juvenile charges of illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material and possession of criminal tools.


Let me get this straight. A law designed to protect minors from exploitation by adults is being used to charge a minor for exploiting herself. What they're saying is that she doesn't have the legal capacity to consent even if she's the one doing the seducing. Confused? I sure am. There must be a lot of teenage boys in Ohio who are now double locking the bathroom door, lest they be labelled sexual predators.

She was held over the weekend? These idiot adults have done far more psychological damage to this child than anything she's done to herself.

Not satisfied with this bit of robotic Political Correctness, these morons are going to spread the stupidity:

"A prosecutor says Licking County authorities also considering charges for students who received the photos."

Kids do dumb things. That's why we call them kids. What excuse do these adults have for compunding the problem by acting even dumber than the children they say they're trying to protect?



Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Dear Leader Obama


I wonder why these kids weren't holding their Little Red Books. It just goes to show how out of touch and ignorant the Hollytard community is. Even if your campaign is nothing more than a dangerous Cult of Personality, it doesn't help to illustrate that fact to millions that actually have some knowledge of history.

Here's a more apt version of this brainwashing:



Or a more modern example:



More at Hot Air

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

New York's Latest Assault on Individualism

From The Center for Consumer Freedom:


Grapes can kill you. And New York City lawmakers want to make sure you’re aware of that danger the next time you unassumingly pick up some produce at your local grocery store. Grapes aren’t the only “threat” targeted by city lawmakers in a bill that would mandate warnings on bite-size foods -- known to be choking hazards for kids younger than five. The ordinance would also add popcorn, pistachios, and peanut butter to the ever-growing list of dangers to our health.

This morsel mandate is a clear-cut example of a public-policy “slippery slope.” Councilmember Domenic Recchia justified his proposal by citing the city’s menu-labeling law as a precedent: “If they can put the number of calories on products sold to the public from fast food restaurants, then we could put labels on products that are dangerous to children.” Following that logic, politicians could label, regulate, or ban anything that’s potentially harmful, which translates to “anything under the sun” (and probably the sun itself too).

Monday, August 11, 2008

They Wanted More School.

David Freddoso uses Obama' education positions to highlight the duplicitous and venal nature of the candidate in all things:

"Obama writes:

[T]heir number one issue was this: Because the school district couldn’t
afford to keep teachers for a full school day, Thornton let out every day at
1:30 in the afternoon. With the abbreviatebd schedule, there was no time for
students to take science lab or foreign language classes.How come we’re getting
shortchanged? they asked me. Seems like nobody even expects us to go to college,
they said.They wanted more school."



The elementary-school day and year in Chicago proper are the shortest of
any major U.S. city. It lasts five hours and 45 minutes, and the schools are
open just 174 days per year. This is entirely a result of the intransigence of
the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU), a staunch ally of Barack Obama and an early
endorser of his presidential candidacy.



The United States already spends the highest percentage of its world's largest GDP on education, while achieving mediocre results at best. The unholy alliance between democrats and teacher's unions exists only to mutually benefit themselves with power and money, while producing socialist indoctrinated drones just ignorant enough not to cause the elites trouble.

Friday, July 18, 2008

Palestinian Rabbit Faces Amputaion On Children's Show



Should we cut the rabbit's hand off for stealing? Or maybe just his ear. These questions are asked in the latest installment of the Palestinian terrorist training show for children, No word on whether Jimmy Carter visited the set for autographs on his last visit. Maybe Obama will get a souvenir T-Shirt for him and his other left wing boys on his trip this week. Are they simulcasting this show in San Fransisco schools yet?

Friday, February 29, 2008

Now Hillary's Dragging My Kids Into This

Uh oh! It's 3 AM. The phone's ringing. Something's happening. Who do you want to answer the phone? If it's Bill on the other end with a dead bimbo in his hotel room, then I guess you should get it Hillary. If it's a real national problem, then I'd want someone who'd think of the country before her personal political considerations. That ain't you honey. I'd be a better choice half drunk and slipping into a raging hangover.