Nicholas Kristoff puts forth the ridiculous notion that Al-Qaeda endorses Mc'Cain and uses as evidence a comment on a message board at an Islamo-Fascist Web Site. Well, that proves it then!
That would put them at odds with all the other thugs and psychopaths that have endorsed Obama. That group of solid Citizens of The World includes, but is not limited to: Hamas, Kim Jong Il, Fidel Castro, Louis Farrakhan, Moammar Qadafi, William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, FARC and The New Black Panther Party.
Kristoff says that a Mc'Cain Presidency would just make people angry, whereas an Obama Presidency will convince 100 million or so extremists to disown their divine belief in a world wide caliphate and the slaughter or subjugation of all who would oppose them:
Yeah, that's it. Kill em' with kindness. That will teach them! Killers that blow up civilians indiscriminately, behead "infidels" on the Internet and murder over cartoons are always open to "building bridges". Then they'll hang you from them.
And the 11,000+ attacks these savages have committed worldwide since 9/11 were because George Bush "fulminates about Islamic terrorism", as if denouncing Barbarism creates more Barbarians. Obama could just ignore the problem as Bill Clinton essentially did. That worked out well.
Kristoff and his pacifist ilk seem immune from the lessons of history. Tyrants and bullies always view appeasement as weakness. Neville Chamberlain learned that the hard way and Kristoff is determined to as well. This enemy views the destruction of western culture as a divine calling and no amount of feel good nonsense will change their mind. Although when it comes to American culture Obama...no Al-Qaeda...no wait a minute. Who were we talking about?
That would put them at odds with all the other thugs and psychopaths that have endorsed Obama. That group of solid Citizens of The World includes, but is not limited to: Hamas, Kim Jong Il, Fidel Castro, Louis Farrakhan, Moammar Qadafi, William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, FARC and The New Black Panther Party.
Kristoff says that a Mc'Cain Presidency would just make people angry, whereas an Obama Presidency will convince 100 million or so extremists to disown their divine belief in a world wide caliphate and the slaughter or subjugation of all who would oppose them:
"An American president who keeps troops in Iraq indefinitely, fulminates about Islamic terrorism, inclines toward military solutions and antagonizes other nations is an excellent recruiting tool. In contrast, an African-American president with a Muslim grandfather and a penchant for building bridges rather than blowing them up would give Al Qaeda recruiters fits."
Yeah, that's it. Kill em' with kindness. That will teach them! Killers that blow up civilians indiscriminately, behead "infidels" on the Internet and murder over cartoons are always open to "building bridges". Then they'll hang you from them.
And the 11,000+ attacks these savages have committed worldwide since 9/11 were because George Bush "fulminates about Islamic terrorism", as if denouncing Barbarism creates more Barbarians. Obama could just ignore the problem as Bill Clinton essentially did. That worked out well.
Kristoff and his pacifist ilk seem immune from the lessons of history. Tyrants and bullies always view appeasement as weakness. Neville Chamberlain learned that the hard way and Kristoff is determined to as well. This enemy views the destruction of western culture as a divine calling and no amount of feel good nonsense will change their mind. Although when it comes to American culture Obama...no Al-Qaeda...no wait a minute. Who were we talking about?
No comments:
Post a Comment